Michael made a nice post about my SimpleLTI effort – here are some of my clarifications as well as comments on one of his previous posts. Michael’s post about SimpleLTI:
Michael’s earlier post about IMS needing to open up:
I also can fix the typos I made in Michael’s entry :)
Michael – just to clarify – my new site is not technically a subset of the IMS LTI specification. The scope of Simple LTI is a subset of the *scope* of the LTI spec – and Simple LTI takes a very similar technical approach to IMS LTI 2.0. Because of the timing of my Google Summer of Code projects and the timing of the IMS LTI 2.0 spec – I needed to do *something* so those students could move forward. Simple LTI is just one vendor