{"id":185,"date":"2006-08-21T09:23:04","date_gmt":"2006-08-21T13:23:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.dr-chuck.com\/wordpress\/?p=185"},"modified":"2011-12-17T12:20:07","modified_gmt":"2011-12-17T16:20:07","slug":"oh-yeah-chucks-views-on-patents-in-general","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dr-chuck.com\/csev-blog\/2006\/08\/oh-yeah-chucks-views-on-patents-in-general\/","title":{"rendered":"Oh Yeah &#8211; Chuck&#8217;s Views on Patents in General"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Caveat: This is personal opinion and should not be quoted out of context to imply *anything* particular or specific about the Patent 6,988,138.  This is general commentary about software patents only.  This is not official Sakai position.  This post is Copyright Me &#8211; All Rights Reserved Period!  Do not quote this in ANY media without contacting me for permission which I will likely give freely assuming that you convince me that my comments will be given the right context to maintain my original intent.<br \/>\nLet me add, that I am not categorically opposed to patents or even software patents &#8211; the essential problem is that the patent office allows overly broad and non-novel patents to get through because they are not willing to say &#8220;no&#8221; during their examination of the patent.<br \/>\nDuring the examination phase &#8211; it is a sole lonely examiner buried under a mound of paperwork versus dug-in lawyers from a well-funded corporation with no public scrutiny of the process.  So to keep from being pummeled, the examiner lets the patents go through and then dumps them in the court system.  *That* is the problem &#8211; the only time any true public analysis or dialog around a software patent happens is in the context of a lawsuit.  And once a court case starts, we all talk have to each other with our hands tied behind our collective backs.<br \/>\nEach time a patent examiner takes the &#8220;easy way out&#8221; &#8211; doing a quick and dirty prior art search &#8211; the market wastes 20 million or so and a couple of years to sort it all out.<br \/>\nHere is the worst part &#8211; because the system is so flawed &#8211; we cannot fault companies for filing tons of patents in their space to defend themselves from scummy individuals who speculatively patent obvious ideas and then hold companies hostage.  We *can* fault companies for what they *do* with those patents once they get them &#8211; but we cannot fault companies for going after defensive patents.<br \/>\nHere is one of those scummy individual patents:<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.eff.org\/patent\/wanted\/patent.php?p=ideaflood<br \/>\nThe patented the concept of &#8220;personalized subdomains&#8221; like csev.umich.edu.  AAARGH!<br \/>\nSo we have a bad system that is set up to encourage and reward bad behavior on the part of individuals and companies.  A patent which was initially filed as &#8220;defensive&#8221; may be pressed into &#8220;offensive&#8221; use because of market conditions &#8211; and again if the court system rewards &#8220;offensive&#8221; use of &#8220;defensive&#8221; patents &#8211; it will happen more and more.<br \/>\nUntil we can fix the patent system, we must simply spend the money each time one of these patents come out and pay lawyers to talk to each other &#8211; so we need a talented legal team (SFLC) at the ready all the time.<br \/>\nAgain &#8211; the overall theme from me &#8211; if you are unhappy &#8211; write a check to the SFLC.  Do it now.  Not just for any one patent &#8211; but for a whole series of patents that are likely to come out and not just for our market &#8211; for the next market as well and not just for the next few months &#8211; but as long as it takes.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Caveat: This is personal opinion and should not be quoted out of context to imply *anything* particular or specific about the Patent 6,988,138. This is general commentary about software patents only. This is not official Sakai position. This post is Copyright Me &#8211; All Rights Reserved Period! Do not quote this in ANY media without [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-185","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dr-chuck.com\/csev-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dr-chuck.com\/csev-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dr-chuck.com\/csev-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dr-chuck.com\/csev-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dr-chuck.com\/csev-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=185"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.dr-chuck.com\/csev-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2270,"href":"https:\/\/www.dr-chuck.com\/csev-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185\/revisions\/2270"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dr-chuck.com\/csev-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=185"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dr-chuck.com\/csev-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=185"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dr-chuck.com\/csev-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=185"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}